Vision
Encoders, resolution, and the capability ladder: OCR, documents, grounding, video, and computer use as one model's job.
Vision is the modality with the deepest capability stack. Multimodality covers how vision got into the language model; this chapter covers what it can do once inside, and the encoder and resolution lineages that gate every capability on the ladder.
The encoder lineage
Figure 1. The encoder lineage. Resolution, not architecture, became the differentiator: fixed square crops lost to packing and tiling because documents and screens are not squares.
The capability ladder
Figure 2. Each rung reuses the one below: grounding needs reading, computer use needs grounding, agents need all of it.
| Capability | Turning point | Current state |
|---|---|---|
| OCR and documents | OCR-free models (2021 to 2022) ended the separate-OCR-stage assumption | Frontier VLMs approaching dedicated-pipeline accuracy but still trailing specialist OCR systems on document benchmarks; vendor document scores are launch-table staples (K3 claims OmniDocBench 91.1, vendor-stated) |
| Charts and tables | Chart reasoning entered standard eval suites (2023 to 2024) | Reliable on clean renders; degrades on dense or low-quality scans |
| Grounding | Coordinate output in open VLMs (2023) | Boxes and points standard in open models; closed frontier exposes it selectively |
| Video | Long context made frames affordable (2024) | Hour-scale understanding shipping; fine-grained temporal reasoning still weak |
| Computer use | Screenshot-to-action agents (2023 to 2024) | Shipping in agent products; reliability, not perception, is the bottleneck |
What gates the ladder
| Gate | Why it binds |
|---|---|
| Resolution vs token budget | Every image is a token bill; dense documents need thousands of tokens or lose small text (Serving) |
| Spatial precision | Language-first decoders localize approximately; grounding accuracy trails detection-specialist models |
| Temporal modeling | Frame sampling into context is not motion understanding; video evals reward retrieval over dynamics |
| Hallucination | Vision inherits the text model’s assertiveness; models describe what plausibly should be in an image (Reasoning) |
Ledger
| Verdict | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Dead | Separate OCR stages feeding text-only models at the frontier; fixed low-resolution square inputs; task-specific vision heads per capability |
| Current | Contrastive ViT towers (SigLIP lineage), dynamic resolution and tiling, coordinate-grounded output, screenshot-driven computer use, video via long context |
| Contested | Encoder-free architectures at frontier scale; whether GUI agents need vision-specific training or general agentic RL suffices; specialist parity for detection and dense OCR |
Next: Long-Horizon Agents, where every capability in this group gets spent.