Scaling Laws
Kaplan, Chinchilla, overtraining, data-constrained and test-time regimes: how the field prices compute before spending it.
Scaling laws are the field’s pricing discipline: fit a power law on small runs, extrapolate, then commit the budget. The discipline survived every era; its constants did not. Each regime change below rewrote where a compute budget should go.
The lineage
Figure 1. Three regime changes in six years. Kaplan priced parameters, Chinchilla repriced data, overtraining priced inference, and test-time compute added a second axis that training laws do not govern.
What each regime got wrong
| Regime | Planning rule | What broke it |
|---|---|---|
| Kaplan (2020 to 2022) | Spend on parameters | Undertrained giants (Gopher); data was mispriced |
| Chinchilla (2022 to 2023) | ~20 tokens per parameter | Optimizes training FLOPs only; serving cost ignored |
| Overtraining (2023 onward) | Overshoot data for small deployable models | Data supply and reuse limits |
| Test-time (2024 onward) | Buy accuracy with thinking tokens | Only prices verifiable domains; costs recur per query (Reasoning) |
Companion debates
| Debate | The dispute | Where practice landed |
|---|---|---|
| Emergence | Abrupt capability jumps (2022) versus metric artifacts of discontinuous scoring (2023) | Plan with smooth proxy metrics, expect surprises anyway |
| Extrapolation risk | Laws fit at small scale have missed regime boundaries (long-context behavior, RL post-training effects) | Staged commitment: scaling ladders with go/no-go gates rather than single extrapolations |
| Specialized laws | MoE sparsity, precision, vocabulary size, and distillation each acquired their own fitted laws from 2023 to 2025 | ”A scaling law for X” became the field’s standard paper template |
Ledger
| Verdict | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Dead | Kaplan constants as planning targets; single-law extrapolation across regimes; “params are all that matters” |
| Current | Chinchilla-style joint fits as baseline, inference-adjusted overtraining, data-constrained corrections, scaling ladders with gates |
| Contested | Test-time compute’s ceiling in unverifiable domains; whether agentic capability scales by any measurable law yet |
Next: Long Context, the capability whose costs the laws above kept mispricing.