Multimodality
Contrastive encoders, adapter bridges, native multimodal pretraining, omni models: how vision and audio moved inside the language model.
Multimodality entered the stack from outside: separate vision models bolted onto frozen language models through progressively thinner bridges, until the bridge disappeared and the modalities moved into pretraining itself. The generation side ran a separate track (diffusion models outside the LLM) that is now converging on the same endpoint.
The understanding lineage
Figure 1. The bridge got thinner until it vanished.
The generation track
Figure 2. Generation converged from the other direction. Diffusion stayed dominant for standalone image quality; frontier assistants moved generation inside the model for instruction-following and editing fidelity.
Milestones
| Milestone | Date | What it established |
|---|---|---|
| CLIP (OpenAI) | Jan 2021 | Web-scale contrastive pairing; the vision encoder every adapter era reused |
| Neural audio codecs (SoundStream, EnCodec) | 2021 to 2022 | Discrete audio tokens; the enabling step for end-to-end speech models |
| Whisper (OpenAI) | Sep 2022 | Web-scale supervised ASR; robust speech recognition as a commodity component |
| Flamingo (DeepMind) | Apr 2022 | Frozen-LM cross-attention; few-shot multimodal |
| BLIP-2 / LLaVA | 2023 | Cheap bridges: Q-Former and a linear projection; visual instruction tuning |
| GPT-4 vision | 2023 | Frontier vision under a closed architecture |
| Gemini 1.0 | Dec 2023 | Stated natively multimodal from the start of pretraining |
| GPT-4o | May 2024 | Single model, end-to-end text, vision, audio; realtime voice latency |
| Chameleon (Meta) | May 2024 | Early-fusion discrete tokens for understanding and generation |
| Text-to-video (Sora, Veo lineage) | 2024 | The generation track’s video milestone; carries the world-model framing |
| Gemini 1.5 | 2024 | Hour-scale video in a 1M context (Long Context) |
| Native image generation in assistants | 2025 | Instruction-faithful editing beats prompt-to-diffusion pipelines |
| K2.5 / K3 vision | 2026 | Open-weight vision: K2.5 via continual pretraining on an existing checkpoint; K3 native, weights due late July 2026 (K3 audit) |
What settled and what did not
| Front | State |
|---|---|
| Vision input | Settled on ViT-lineage encoders feeding the decoder, with dynamic resolution and tiling replacing fixed-square crops (2024 onward); open whether the separate encoder survives at all or early fusion absorbs it |
| Visual representation | The live fork: continuous embeddings (most deployed models) versus discrete tokens (Chameleon lineage, generation-friendly); neither has won |
| Audio | Followed vision’s path faster: cascaded ASR-LLM-TTS pipelines gave way to end-to-end speech in omni models; cascades survive where controllability and cost matter |
| Modality retrofits | The open-weight path: add a modality to an existing checkpoint, either by adapter training around a frozen model (Llama 3.2) or by full continual pretraining (K2.5), rather than retraining from scratch (Objectives & Pretraining) |
| Evaluation | Lags: multimodal benchmarks (MMMU and successors) sit earlier on the saturation-contamination curve than text (Evaluation) |
Ledger
| Verdict | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Dead | Caption-only vision-language training; fixed low-resolution square inputs at the frontier; cascaded pipelines as the frontier voice interface |
| Current | Native multimodal pretraining, ViT encoders with dynamic resolution, visual instruction tuning, continual-pretrain modality retrofits, end-to-end audio in omni models |
| Contested | Discrete vs continuous visual tokens; encoder-free early fusion at frontier scale; diffusion vs in-model generation for standalone image quality |
Next: Vision, what the dominant modality can do once inside.