Solutions · Use case

Structured Extraction.

Generative AI, scoped to the problem it solves.

Schema-conformant extraction of fields, entities, and tables from messy inputs.

Use-case context

In document-heavy industries, much of the back-office spend goes to people transcribing fields off PDFs, emails, and scanned forms into ERP, claims, or case-management systems. Rules-based OCR breaks on layout drift. Naive LLM extraction quietly invents fields when the source is ambiguous. Both are expensive when the downstream system trusts the value. We build extraction pipelines that bind output to an explicit JSON schema, score each field with its own confidence, and route low-confidence fields to a reviewer queue. The schema doubles as the contract for downstream integrations, so the receiving system never sees an unexpected shape. Measured by per-field F1 against a labelled holdout, plus calibration error on the confidence scores so low-confidence flags really do map to low accuracy. Throughput is tracked against the cost of the human review it displaces. We do not write to downstream systems of record without explicit confidence gates and human review for low-confidence fields. Auto-write to claims, billing, or trading systems is out of scope. In our coverage footprint this lands first across financial services, healthcare, energy: the sectors where the data shapes and evaluation criteria line up cleanly with what this use-case actually measures.

Data shape

PDFs, emails with attachments, scanned forms, EDI feeds, supplier documents, submission packets, and the target schema in the receiving system of record.

Where we draw the line

We do not write to downstream systems of record without explicit confidence gates and human review for low-confidence fields. Auto-write to claims, billing, or trading systems is out of scope.

Talk to us about a structured extraction engagement

A 30-minute call to scope where structured extraction moves the curve against your evaluation criteria.

Book strategy call

Why work with Veso AI on structured extraction

Measured

Evaluation, not opinion

Measured by per-field F1 against a labelled holdout, plus calibration error on the confidence scores so low-confidence flags really do map to low accuracy. Throughput is tracked against the cost of the human review it displaces.

Proven

Quality you can measure

In the first two weeks we build a labelled evaluation set with your experts, so quality is measured from day one, not hoped for.

Production

Built to operate

We hand over working software, infrastructure-as-code, and an evaluation harness your team can run and maintain.

Related use-cases

FAQ

Structured Extraction: frequently asked questions

How is success measured for structured extraction engagements?

Measured by per-field F1 against a labelled holdout, plus calibration error on the confidence scores so low-confidence flags really do map to low accuracy. Throughput is tracked against the cost of the human review it displaces. The evaluation harness is part of the deliverable, not an afterthought. We build it during the engagement so your team can run it against the next prompt, model, or pipeline change without us.

Where does Veso AI NOT apply structured extraction?

We do not write to downstream systems of record without explicit confidence gates and human review for low-confidence fields. Auto-write to claims, billing, or trading systems is out of scope. This is a deliberate trust boundary, not a capability gap. We are equipped to build the systems we decline to build, and we decline to build them because the risk-to-value ratio in those surfaces does not justify it.

Which industries does structured extraction apply to?

In our coverage footprint, structured extraction most commonly lands in financial services, healthcare, energy, insurance. The specific deployment shape varies by industry: data shapes, evaluation criteria, and regulators differ enough that we re-scope each engagement against the sector it lands in.

What data shape do you need to start a structured extraction engagement?

PDFs, emails with attachments, scanned forms, EDI feeds, supplier documents, submission packets, and the target schema in the receiving system of record. In the first two weeks we look at the real data (what exists, what is labelled, where it has to live) and build the plan around what is actually there, not around an assumption.

Which Veso AI services ship structured extraction?

structured extraction ships under our Generative AI Consulting, Custom Software Development, AI Integration Services, Data Science & Analytics service lines, depending on the integration surface and the build-vs-platform trade-off. Most engagements draw on more than one. The boundary between consulting, custom build, and integration is a scoping decision we make explicit during discovery.

How does a structured extraction engagement typically start?

We spend two weeks with your leadership and operators, build an evaluation set with your subject-matter experts, and come back with a clear plan and a clear price. That evaluation set anchors every decision after it (model choice, prompt strategy, retrieval design) so quality is measurable from week one, not from go-live.

Industries where structured extraction applies

Service lines that ship structured extraction

Stay updated